Internet activism. Where else can so many feel so good about doing so little? Everyone knows that posting a status update, even without links to sites that allow you learn more about a problem or take action of any kind, is more effective than 1,000 people in cause bracelets driving 1,000 SUVs with yellow ribbon magnets. Internet activism allows you to stand alongside the small, brave, overwhelming majority of citizens who feel the same way you do and tell those (mostly imaginary) enemies of America what for! It makes me want to wrap myself in a Gadsen flag! FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM!
Occasionally, you find something on the internet that perfectly encapsulates everything that’s wrong with online activism. The “Wear Red On Fridays” Facebook page is one of those things. Text from the info page of the site is italicized.
***
Will You give this to my Daddy?
As a Company, Southwest Airlines is going to support 'Red Fridays.'
Last week I was in Atlanta , Georgia attending a conference. While I was in the airport, returning home, I heard several people behind me beginning to clap and cheer. I immediately turned around and witnessed One of the greatest acts of patriotism I have ever seen.
Moving thru the terminal was a group of soldiers in their camos. As t...hey began heading to their gate, everyone (well almost everyone) was abruptly to their feet with their hands waving and cheering.
***
Really, a bunch of people cheering and clapping in an airport is one of the greatest acts of patriotism you’ve ever seen? Seriously?
***
When I saw the soldiers, probably 30-40 of them, being applauded and Cheered for, it hit me. I'm not alone. I'm not the only red-blooded American who still loves this country and supports our troops and their families.
***
I’ll assume you were exaggerating and by “only” you meant that, prior to all this patriotic clapping, you thought you were one of a small minority of people who support our troops and their families. With all the “We Hate Our Troops” signs on every street corner, I can see where you’d get that idea. People just hate the troops, don’t they? After all, if you ask 100 people whether or not they support our troops, I’m sure at least 99 of them will scream “Die American swine-dog!” and start beating you in the head with their Osama bin Laden commemorative coffee mugs.
***
Of course I immediately stopped and began clapping for these young unsung heroes who are putting their lives on the line everyday for us so we can go to school, work and home without fear or reprisal.
***
I’m sure it was a great act of patriotism on your part. Much greater than risking your own life, health, mental state, personal relationships, and financial stability to serve your country in the military or something lame like that.
***
Just when I thought I could not be more proud of my country or of our Service men and women, a young girl, not more than 6 or 7 years old ran up to one of the male soldiers. He kneeled down and said 'hi...'
The little girl then asked him if he would give something to her daddy for her...
***
The suspense is killing me. Or maybe it’s just the overuse of ellipses. Please go on...
***
The young soldier, who didn't look any older than maybe 22 himself, said he would try and what did she want to give to her daddy. Then suddenly the little girl grabbed the neck of this soldier, gave him the biggest hug she could muster and then kissed him on the cheek.
The mother of the little girl, who said her daughter's name was Courtney, told the young soldier that her husband was a Marine and had been in Iraq for 11 months now. As the mom was explaining how much her daughter Courtney missed her father, the young soldier began to tear up.
When this temporarily single mom was done explaining her situation, all of the soldiers huddled together for a brief second... Then one of the other servicemen pulled out a military-looking walkie-talkie. They started playing with the device and talking back and forth on it..
After about 10-15 seconds of this, the young soldier walked back over to Courtney, bent down and said this to her, 'I spoke to your daddy and he told me to give this to you.' He then hugged this little girl that he had just met and gave her a kiss on the cheek. He finished by saying 'your daddy told me to tell you that he loves you more than anything and he is coming home very soon.'
The mom at this point was crying almost uncontrollably and as the young soldier stood to his feet, he saluted Courtney and her mom. I was standing no more than 6 feet away from this entire event.
***
Urban Dictionary defines “glurge” as “[a] word used to describe the syrupy sweet e-mails that are mass-mailed to unwilling participants. Usually involve, puppies, kitties, children with disabilities, puppies and kitties with disabilities, and Jesus. Generally end with, ‘Pass this along 2 as many ppl as u can!!!11!!1!’” While the above story was distributed via Facebook rather than mass email, I think the definition still works nicely.
***
As the soldiers began to leave, heading towards their gate, people resumed their applause. As I stood there applauding and looked around, there were very few dry eyes, including my own. That young soldier in one last act of selflessness turned around and blew a kiss to Courtney with a tear rolling down his cheek.
***
That soldier’s selflessness is matched only by your patriotism. Seriously, you should have some idea what words mean before you start throwing them around all willy-nilly like that.
***
We need to remember everyday all of our soldiers and their families and thank God for them and their sacrifices. At the end of the day, it's good to be an American.
***
WE’RE NUMBER 1!
[Note: Does not apply to air quality, education, health care, longevity, wealth distribution, and a host of other commonly accepted quality of life indicators].
***
RED FRIDAYS ----- Very soon, you will see a great many people wearing red every Friday. The reason? Americans who support our troops used to be called the 'silent majority'. We are no longer silent, and are voicing our love for God, country and home in record breaking numbers.
***
This might be valid if by “used to” you mean the Vietnam War era, but even then the idea of a silent majority had a lot more with winning votes by setting Nixon up as the “anti-hippie” candidate than any actual belief that the majority of Americans sided with the most misguided of the war protesters. Today, it’s even less apt. If the peace movement learned anything from Vietnam, it was that American soldiers must not be lumped in with the officers, politicians, and government contractors who decide to send them to war. Even if you could find troop-hating anti-war demonstrators today, presenting them as exemplars of the peace movement as a whole is just as intellectually dishonest and claiming that the Westboro Baptist Church represents mainstream Christianity.
***
Our idea of showing solidarity and support for our troops with dignity and respect starts this Friday - and continues each and every Friday until the troops all come home, sending a deafening message that.. Every red-blooded American who supports our men and women afar will wear something red.
By word of mouth, press, TV -- let's make the United States on every Friday a sea of red much like a homecoming football game in the bleachers.
If every one of us who loves this country will share this with acquaintances, co-workers, friends, and family. It will not be long before the USA is covered in RED.
***
And that will accomplish what, exactly? Does all that red somehow protect the troops from bullets? Does it bring them home earlier? Will it make the politicians who decided to send them into harm’s way consider what they’re asking of our troops more carefully next time around? Will wearing red cause a soldier to grow back an arm, regain the ability to walk, or forget the terrible things he's seen in combat?
No, it won’t. All it will do is make you feel better about yourself without actually doing anything. Wearing red on Fridays is slactivism at its best. If you want to actually do something that will help a soldier, donate your time or money to the programs that help soldiers find jobs and homes, provide medical treatment for wounded soldiers, or help the families of soldiers who have been killed. If that’s too much to ask, write your representatives in Congress and ask them to bring our troops home and promise to never again ask them to risk their lives fighting an unnecessary war.
***
The first thing a soldier says when asked 'What can we do to make things better for you?' is.....We need your support and your prayers.
***
Really? Did you actually ask any soldiers that question before making up your own answer? I’d think that answers like “send body armor” or “get me out of here” would be more common. Any soldier who does go with the “support and prayers” answer is probably doing so to be polite rather than because he believes that magical thinking on your part will help him on the battlefield.
***
Let's get the word out and lead with class and dignity, by example.
***
Your brave example of making the ultimate sacrifice (wearing red once a week, even if it might clash with your outfit) may be the greatest display of patriotism I have ever seen.
If you’d prefer to do something more substantial than sending happy thoughts, the USO website has information on several programs that you can donate to or volunteer for.
All italicized comes from the Support Our Troops, Wear Red Friday Facebook page (linked above) and is the property of the owner(s) of that page. It is used here for satirical purposes.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Monday, February 28, 2011
Honeywell’s Storage Pond Shut-down Plan Is Completely Safe (According To Honeywell)
From the Feburary 2011 issue of Bazooka Magazine
I went to Honeywell’s community meeting on January 12th mainly because I thought it would be a good place to hear some gossip and maybe talk to some people about a possible story on the lockout. The actual reason of the meeting--Honeywell’s plan to close four storage ponds at the plant--didn’t seem like much of a story. The ponds (and all the toxic waste in them) are already there, so turning them into a solid mass and covering them up didn’t seem like too bad a plan. I think that’s the kind of reaction they were hoping for, because their definitions of “community,” “meeting,” and “Honeywell” differed quite a bit from my expectations.
For starters, everyone had to sign in as soon as they walked in the door (though unlike Mayor Paxton, Honeywell didn’t ask for an address). This might be mandated by the same IEPA (Illinois Environmental Protection Agency)/NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) regulations that required Honeywell to hold the meeting in the first place, but (especially with the lockout going on), there was kind of a Big Brother vibe that didn’t really scream “community” to me, especially with six Honeywell security guys hanging around. Unfortunately, it only occurred to me after I’d signed in that I should have said I was Hagbard Celine of the Erisian Liberation Front. The “Honeywell” part also seemed a bit incorrect, since there wasn’t a single Honeywell spokesperson there (unless you count the goon squad)--just four representatives from the companies contracted to do the sludge pool closing.
As far as the “meeting” part goes, that is a technically correct, because they didn’t say “presentation.” They had some big fancy posters and a Power Point presentation running when the doors opened, and everyone sat down and waited for them to start talking. After about 20 minutes, people started to wonder if they were going to say anything at all. One of the USW guys finally confirmed our doubts by announcing (as he stood right in the path of the one TV camera there) “Everybody can go home, this is all they’re going to do.” One of Honeywell’s contractor confirmed that this was the case and tried to defend this set-up, telling him that they’d be happy to answer questions “one-on-one.” Since the obvious implication was that Honeywell didn’t want people’s concerns to really be publicly aired, this didn’t win the company any points.
It wasn’t long before all four reps were surrounded by groups of people, most of them current or locked-out Honeywell employees asking some serious questions about the plan to close down the ponds. After a few minutes of this, the contractors huddled up and decided to actually answer questions from the attendees as a group. While this decision might have just been made to avoid facing an angry mob, the spokespeople at least deserve some credit for realizing that their plan for the meeting just wasn't going to cut it. Once this started, the “cover up the sludge” plan seemed less and less sound to me. I realize that a lot of the people there were USW folks who have an interest in making Honeywell look bad, but the impression I got was that most of the workers there were people who know what goes on inside the plant and have serious reservations about Honeywell’s plan to close the pond. So either a lot of steel workers might have a future in acting if they don’t go back to work, or they’re genuinely concerned about the potential damage this plan can cause, and any points scored for the union are just a bonus.
Here’s a rundown of the potential problems with Honeywell’s plan:
* One of the big issues that kept coming up is the uranium content of the ponds. According to Honeywell, the average is 200-300 parts per million, which is equivalent to normal background levels of radiation. Several of the workers at the meeting, however, told stories of regularly pulling up samples that were 1,000 or more parts per million, and question whether the samples used by Honeywell are representative. Many of the workers were more inclined to believe their own experience rather than Honeywell's reports, especially given some of the questions about the company's credibility that have been raised in recent months regarding accidents at the plant.
* Another reason many questioned why the ponds are being shut down is that one of the most dangerous chemicals in the sludge, Calcium Fluoride, is used in the conversion process--at one point Honeywell management told employees that the ponds contained $1 million worth of raw materials that could be recovered and used. While this doesn’t get rid of all the toxic chemicals, it at least means a chunk of them will be shipped off to a nuclear plant somewhere and become someone else’s problem. The general consensus at the meeting seemed to be that closing down the ponds was the cheaper solution than recovering the useful materials or having the ponds shipped to a toxic waste dump (as they did with another pond several years ago).
* While a “solidify and cover” plan like this has been used in similar applications, the uniqueness of the Honeywell plant (and the fact that the chemicals in the ponds are known to erode concrete in the plant, and even the boats used on the ponds) makes some people wonder if it will work with this particular cocktail of chemicals. Honeywell plans to monitor the local water supply once the project is complete, but has no contingency plans for what to do if the water (and most likely the Ohio River shortly thereafter) turns up contaminated. Since Honeywell workers have not been allowed to drink the water in the plant for 2 years as it is, this lack of a backup plan doesn’t really inspire confidence. As one attendee of the meeting put it, “The contingency plan for something that’s going to be around for 4.5 billion years should explore all possibilities.”
* The last major problem concerns the liner that’s currently under the ponds. Its condition is unknown, but given that there have been leaks in the past, most of the workers aren’t confident that it will survive the process of mixing the solidifying agent into the ponds. The Honeywell contractors repeatedly pointed out that the liner didn’t even count as far as the EPA was concerned. The problem, of course, is that the EPA discounting of the liner only matters once the sludge is solidified. While it’s still a liquid, the liner is all that keeps the stuff from leaking out. The workers who asked about the liner were worried about what would happen if the liner breaks when the weight of the solidifying agent is added in but before everything settles into a solid mass. The spokespeople consistently failed to address this concern, going back to the EPA’s refusal to recognize the liner once the process was completed. This might have been an honest misunderstanding, but I have my doubts.
So, if you’re worried about this, what can you do? Unfortunately, not a lot. The 60-day public comment period ended on January 31. Even if you would have commented, your comments would not have necessarily influence the IEPA or NRC’s decision. In fact, from what I can gather, public comments are only entered into the official record if there’s a public hearing, and that only happens if there is “significant public comment.” Even comments from a hearing don’t necessarily affect the final decision (though they can result in stiffer penalties if something goes wrong later on)--it’s all up to the regulators, and that might be the most troubling aspect of the whole process. Of the four Honeywell contractors at the meeting, one was former IEPA regulator and I got the strong impression that another used to work for the NRC. If the revolving door between regulators and the people they’re regulating doesn’t seem like a problem, you might want to check out some news stories from the Gulf of Mexico and Wall Street from the last couple of years.
I went to Honeywell’s community meeting on January 12th mainly because I thought it would be a good place to hear some gossip and maybe talk to some people about a possible story on the lockout. The actual reason of the meeting--Honeywell’s plan to close four storage ponds at the plant--didn’t seem like much of a story. The ponds (and all the toxic waste in them) are already there, so turning them into a solid mass and covering them up didn’t seem like too bad a plan. I think that’s the kind of reaction they were hoping for, because their definitions of “community,” “meeting,” and “Honeywell” differed quite a bit from my expectations.
For starters, everyone had to sign in as soon as they walked in the door (though unlike Mayor Paxton, Honeywell didn’t ask for an address). This might be mandated by the same IEPA (Illinois Environmental Protection Agency)/NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) regulations that required Honeywell to hold the meeting in the first place, but (especially with the lockout going on), there was kind of a Big Brother vibe that didn’t really scream “community” to me, especially with six Honeywell security guys hanging around. Unfortunately, it only occurred to me after I’d signed in that I should have said I was Hagbard Celine of the Erisian Liberation Front. The “Honeywell” part also seemed a bit incorrect, since there wasn’t a single Honeywell spokesperson there (unless you count the goon squad)--just four representatives from the companies contracted to do the sludge pool closing.
As far as the “meeting” part goes, that is a technically correct, because they didn’t say “presentation.” They had some big fancy posters and a Power Point presentation running when the doors opened, and everyone sat down and waited for them to start talking. After about 20 minutes, people started to wonder if they were going to say anything at all. One of the USW guys finally confirmed our doubts by announcing (as he stood right in the path of the one TV camera there) “Everybody can go home, this is all they’re going to do.” One of Honeywell’s contractor confirmed that this was the case and tried to defend this set-up, telling him that they’d be happy to answer questions “one-on-one.” Since the obvious implication was that Honeywell didn’t want people’s concerns to really be publicly aired, this didn’t win the company any points.
It wasn’t long before all four reps were surrounded by groups of people, most of them current or locked-out Honeywell employees asking some serious questions about the plan to close down the ponds. After a few minutes of this, the contractors huddled up and decided to actually answer questions from the attendees as a group. While this decision might have just been made to avoid facing an angry mob, the spokespeople at least deserve some credit for realizing that their plan for the meeting just wasn't going to cut it. Once this started, the “cover up the sludge” plan seemed less and less sound to me. I realize that a lot of the people there were USW folks who have an interest in making Honeywell look bad, but the impression I got was that most of the workers there were people who know what goes on inside the plant and have serious reservations about Honeywell’s plan to close the pond. So either a lot of steel workers might have a future in acting if they don’t go back to work, or they’re genuinely concerned about the potential damage this plan can cause, and any points scored for the union are just a bonus.
Here’s a rundown of the potential problems with Honeywell’s plan:
* One of the big issues that kept coming up is the uranium content of the ponds. According to Honeywell, the average is 200-300 parts per million, which is equivalent to normal background levels of radiation. Several of the workers at the meeting, however, told stories of regularly pulling up samples that were 1,000 or more parts per million, and question whether the samples used by Honeywell are representative. Many of the workers were more inclined to believe their own experience rather than Honeywell's reports, especially given some of the questions about the company's credibility that have been raised in recent months regarding accidents at the plant.
* Another reason many questioned why the ponds are being shut down is that one of the most dangerous chemicals in the sludge, Calcium Fluoride, is used in the conversion process--at one point Honeywell management told employees that the ponds contained $1 million worth of raw materials that could be recovered and used. While this doesn’t get rid of all the toxic chemicals, it at least means a chunk of them will be shipped off to a nuclear plant somewhere and become someone else’s problem. The general consensus at the meeting seemed to be that closing down the ponds was the cheaper solution than recovering the useful materials or having the ponds shipped to a toxic waste dump (as they did with another pond several years ago).
* While a “solidify and cover” plan like this has been used in similar applications, the uniqueness of the Honeywell plant (and the fact that the chemicals in the ponds are known to erode concrete in the plant, and even the boats used on the ponds) makes some people wonder if it will work with this particular cocktail of chemicals. Honeywell plans to monitor the local water supply once the project is complete, but has no contingency plans for what to do if the water (and most likely the Ohio River shortly thereafter) turns up contaminated. Since Honeywell workers have not been allowed to drink the water in the plant for 2 years as it is, this lack of a backup plan doesn’t really inspire confidence. As one attendee of the meeting put it, “The contingency plan for something that’s going to be around for 4.5 billion years should explore all possibilities.”
* The last major problem concerns the liner that’s currently under the ponds. Its condition is unknown, but given that there have been leaks in the past, most of the workers aren’t confident that it will survive the process of mixing the solidifying agent into the ponds. The Honeywell contractors repeatedly pointed out that the liner didn’t even count as far as the EPA was concerned. The problem, of course, is that the EPA discounting of the liner only matters once the sludge is solidified. While it’s still a liquid, the liner is all that keeps the stuff from leaking out. The workers who asked about the liner were worried about what would happen if the liner breaks when the weight of the solidifying agent is added in but before everything settles into a solid mass. The spokespeople consistently failed to address this concern, going back to the EPA’s refusal to recognize the liner once the process was completed. This might have been an honest misunderstanding, but I have my doubts.
So, if you’re worried about this, what can you do? Unfortunately, not a lot. The 60-day public comment period ended on January 31. Even if you would have commented, your comments would not have necessarily influence the IEPA or NRC’s decision. In fact, from what I can gather, public comments are only entered into the official record if there’s a public hearing, and that only happens if there is “significant public comment.” Even comments from a hearing don’t necessarily affect the final decision (though they can result in stiffer penalties if something goes wrong later on)--it’s all up to the regulators, and that might be the most troubling aspect of the whole process. Of the four Honeywell contractors at the meeting, one was former IEPA regulator and I got the strong impression that another used to work for the NRC. If the revolving door between regulators and the people they’re regulating doesn’t seem like a problem, you might want to check out some news stories from the Gulf of Mexico and Wall Street from the last couple of years.
Monday, February 14, 2011
The Bucky Awards
From the current issue of Bazooka Magazine.
It’s awards season, and there’s really no reason why people with informed opinions and credentials should have all the fun. Nominees for each category were selected by a panel of me and winners were decided by a vote of eligible members of the Manitoba Academy (also me). Where appropriate, I have provided commentary to further explain the award and/or decision.
Books & Comics
Literary Event of the Year: The release of Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 1 by Mark Twain
How often does a guy who’s been dead for a century release a new book?
Book of the Year: Last Words: A Memoir by George Carlin and Tony Hendra
This books was actually released in November of 2009, but in the words of Carlin himself, “these are my rules, I make ‘em up.”
Best Short Story Collection: Who Fears The Devil?(Planet Stories) by Manley Wade Wellman, collected by Paizo Publishing
A collection of stories about John the Balladeer, an Appalachian troubadour who fights evil with his silver-stringed guitar. It’s like a Shack Shakers album in book form.
Most Inexplicable Literary Phenomenon: Steig Larsson’s The Girl Who Did Things series
I’ll admit I’ve only seen the movies, but I just don’t get it. I could see an argument that the girl of the title is a strong female character, but all her strength is rooted in victimhood, Swedish Hero Man ultimately saves her every time, and I’ve got a sneaking suspicion that she may in fact just be spank material for some dude named Steig. Also, I hear the writing’s pretty bad.
Most Still Alive Author: Dave Barry
Because I just realized that with the exception of Hendra, every author I’ve mentioned so far is dead.
Best New Comic: The Sixth Gun by Cullen Bunn and Brian Hurtt
Awarded to the creative team with the most double consonants in their names.
Most Disappointing Character Death: Rupert Giles in Buffy The Vampire Slayer Season Eight
If you’re going to kill a character whose been around since the beginning of the TV series, you really should make it count (and get a better artist to draw it).
Comic Book Character With Too Fucking Many Titles: Batman
Seriously, I can’t afford all this shit.
Worst Mini-Series of the Year: The Rise of Arsenal by J.T. Krul
It’s very likely that The Rise of Arsenal is, in fact, the worst comic mini-series ever. After his daughter is killed in a super-villain-caused disaster, Roy Harper (formerly Green Arrow’s heroin addict sidekick, Speedy, who at different times has also been known as Arsenal and Red Arrow), understandably loses his shit and starts doing a new drug called “China cat.” Some authors would have turned this into a poignant story of loss and redemption, but not J.T. Krul. In no time, Krul has Roy remembering the good ol’ days of drug use and gang rape with the ghost of his former dealer, and by issue 3 (arguably the worst comic ever written), Roy has his ex (and dead kid’s mother) tied up and is trying to have sex with her, but can’t get it up. So he goes out and beats up some homeless guys in order to protect a dead cat (that he thinks is his daughter). Then Batman shows up and beats the shit out of him while telling him, After-School Special style, “I’m your friend!” I’m sure I read beyond that, but at this point I’ve blocked it out. This mini-series managed to take a character who for decades has been merely uninteresting and make him unlikable and creepy.
Worst Ongoing Comic Series of the Year: Green Arrow by J.T. Krul
Fucking J.T. Krul. After he made us hate Arsenal, he was allowed to take on the re-launch of Green Arrow. The premise: well, Green Arrow’s sort of like Robin Hood, so he should be an outlaw in a forest. So, since a huge chunk of Star City has just been destroyed (in the catastrophe that killed Roy Harper's daughter and/or cat), why not have a magical forest spring up there, banish Green Arrow from Star City, and have him live in the forest? I’ll tell you why not, J.T. Because it’s fucking retarded. Green Arrow is my favorite super-hero, but I secretly hope for this title to be canceled.
Politics & Journalism
Reporter of the Year: Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone)
For making Wall Street and banking schemes that were incomprehensible by design understandable to normal humans, and doing it in an entertaining way.
Best Political Blog: You Are Dumb (www.youaredumb.net)
For calling out stupid people for being stupid.
Best Kentucky Blogger: Joe Sonka of Barefoot & Progressive (http://barefootandprogressive.blogspot.com/)
For asking whether there will be dinosaurs on the ark.
Story of the Year: Jon Ronson’s interview with the Insane Clown Posse, in which they reveal that they are, and have always been, evangelical Christians.
Because a giraffe is a fucking miracle.
Stupidest Political Trend: The Left claiming that their rhetoric is just as hateful and violent as the Right’s.
Seriously. Quit it.
Funniest Political Story: Aqua Buddha
Remember, it’s funnier to the tune of Kool & The Gang’s “Jungle Boogie.”
Southern Hospitality Award: The City of Mayfield
For their acceptance of the Somali Muslims.
Gadsden Flag Award: Rand Paul
For protecting small business owners from the kind of government tyranny that would require them to serve black people.
Biggest Disappointment: The Mid-term Elections/The Obama Presidency (tie)
These are really two sides of the same coin, both proving that most Americans are stupid enough to believe that there’s a difference between the political parties. The truth is we’ve got one party: The Corporate Interest Party, which politically is somewhere to the right of nearly every single one of the first 39 Presidents. We need some variety. Next time around, lets elect some old school Democrats, old school Republicans, true Progressives, principled Libertarians, Environmental Nutjobs, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and METHODISTS!
Movies
Best Movie: True Grit
Best Use Of Gratuitous Violence In A Motion Picture: Machete
Triumph of the Year: The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus
Those of us who have experienced the heartbreak of watching Lost In La Mancha were sure that Heath Ledger’s death would make this another Gilliam movie that never saw the light of day.
Tragedy of the Year: News that The Man Who Killed Don Quixote was once again on hold.
Seriously, why the hell won’t somebody just give Gilliam a big pile of money? Also, the film rights to Good Omens.
Worst Movie News: That they’re making a Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie without Joss Whedon.
Hudson Hawk Award: Scott Pilgrim Vs. The Universe
The Hudson Hawk Award goes to the most awesome move of the year that most people just didn’t get.
What You See Is What You Get Award: Hot Tub Time Machine
Most Wasted Potential: The Expendables
Worst Casting Decision: Giving Ali Shawkat a role with almost no lines. (Runaways, which also totally dissed Lita Ford).
Most Gratuitously Ironic Ending In An Otherwise Very Good Movie: A Single Man
Worst Movie of the Year: Faster
Most Overdue Award: Jeff Bridges’ Oscar for Crazy Heart.
Music
Album of the Year: AgriDustrial, The Legendary Shack Shakers
Song of the Year: “Hoboes Are My Heroes” by The Legendary Shack Shakers
While the song is, in fact, great, the real reason the Shack Shakers get this award is for their early recognition of the fact that 2011 will be the Year of the Hobo. Hobos are going to be the new zombies, folks. Get ready for it.
Local Band of the Year: Uncle Skunkle & The Scarecrow Family Band
Long-time title-holders The Union Suit were edged out this year by Skunkle, in part because these guys played so damn many shows--hall shows, house parties, bar mitzvahs--Hell, if you didn’t lock your door there was a good chance you’d come home to find them setting up instruments in your living room. Also, I’m pretty sure they stole some of Trent Summar’s Hank Flamingo-era outfits, which has to count for something.
Miscellaneous
Celebrity Who Turned Out To Be Just Who We Always Hoped He Was: Bill Murray
As revealed in Dan Fierman’s GQ interview. The Daniel Clowes art was also a nice touch.
Most Talked About Geek Television Event: AMC’s The Walking Dead
Fucking Kirkman.
Meme of the Year: The “Bed Intruder Song” by Antoine Dodson & Autotune The News
T-Shirt of the Year: Topless Robot’s shirt featuring Dr. Doom riding a Unicorn
Role-Playing Game of the Year: American Artifacts (Hex Games)
There were a lot of worthy nominees in this category: Sex, Lies, & Ultraspies (Hex Games), Mars & Venus At War (Hex Games), Fratboys Vs. (Hex Games), and many others(mostly not Hex Games), but American Artifacts wins the prize.
Winner of ComicCon: Helen Miran, for her Harvey Pekar shirt.
It’s awards season, and there’s really no reason why people with informed opinions and credentials should have all the fun. Nominees for each category were selected by a panel of me and winners were decided by a vote of eligible members of the Manitoba Academy (also me). Where appropriate, I have provided commentary to further explain the award and/or decision.
Books & Comics
Literary Event of the Year: The release of Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 1 by Mark Twain
How often does a guy who’s been dead for a century release a new book?
Book of the Year: Last Words: A Memoir by George Carlin and Tony Hendra
This books was actually released in November of 2009, but in the words of Carlin himself, “these are my rules, I make ‘em up.”
Best Short Story Collection: Who Fears The Devil?(Planet Stories) by Manley Wade Wellman, collected by Paizo Publishing
A collection of stories about John the Balladeer, an Appalachian troubadour who fights evil with his silver-stringed guitar. It’s like a Shack Shakers album in book form.
Most Inexplicable Literary Phenomenon: Steig Larsson’s The Girl Who Did Things series
I’ll admit I’ve only seen the movies, but I just don’t get it. I could see an argument that the girl of the title is a strong female character, but all her strength is rooted in victimhood, Swedish Hero Man ultimately saves her every time, and I’ve got a sneaking suspicion that she may in fact just be spank material for some dude named Steig. Also, I hear the writing’s pretty bad.
Most Still Alive Author: Dave Barry
Because I just realized that with the exception of Hendra, every author I’ve mentioned so far is dead.
Best New Comic: The Sixth Gun by Cullen Bunn and Brian Hurtt
Awarded to the creative team with the most double consonants in their names.
Most Disappointing Character Death: Rupert Giles in Buffy The Vampire Slayer Season Eight
If you’re going to kill a character whose been around since the beginning of the TV series, you really should make it count (and get a better artist to draw it).
Comic Book Character With Too Fucking Many Titles: Batman
Seriously, I can’t afford all this shit.
Worst Mini-Series of the Year: The Rise of Arsenal by J.T. Krul
It’s very likely that The Rise of Arsenal is, in fact, the worst comic mini-series ever. After his daughter is killed in a super-villain-caused disaster, Roy Harper (formerly Green Arrow’s heroin addict sidekick, Speedy, who at different times has also been known as Arsenal and Red Arrow), understandably loses his shit and starts doing a new drug called “China cat.” Some authors would have turned this into a poignant story of loss and redemption, but not J.T. Krul. In no time, Krul has Roy remembering the good ol’ days of drug use and gang rape with the ghost of his former dealer, and by issue 3 (arguably the worst comic ever written), Roy has his ex (and dead kid’s mother) tied up and is trying to have sex with her, but can’t get it up. So he goes out and beats up some homeless guys in order to protect a dead cat (that he thinks is his daughter). Then Batman shows up and beats the shit out of him while telling him, After-School Special style, “I’m your friend!” I’m sure I read beyond that, but at this point I’ve blocked it out. This mini-series managed to take a character who for decades has been merely uninteresting and make him unlikable and creepy.
Worst Ongoing Comic Series of the Year: Green Arrow by J.T. Krul
Fucking J.T. Krul. After he made us hate Arsenal, he was allowed to take on the re-launch of Green Arrow. The premise: well, Green Arrow’s sort of like Robin Hood, so he should be an outlaw in a forest. So, since a huge chunk of Star City has just been destroyed (in the catastrophe that killed Roy Harper's daughter and/or cat), why not have a magical forest spring up there, banish Green Arrow from Star City, and have him live in the forest? I’ll tell you why not, J.T. Because it’s fucking retarded. Green Arrow is my favorite super-hero, but I secretly hope for this title to be canceled.
Politics & Journalism
Reporter of the Year: Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone)
For making Wall Street and banking schemes that were incomprehensible by design understandable to normal humans, and doing it in an entertaining way.
Best Political Blog: You Are Dumb (www.youaredumb.net)
For calling out stupid people for being stupid.
Best Kentucky Blogger: Joe Sonka of Barefoot & Progressive (http://barefootandprogressive.blogspot.com/)
For asking whether there will be dinosaurs on the ark.
Story of the Year: Jon Ronson’s interview with the Insane Clown Posse, in which they reveal that they are, and have always been, evangelical Christians.
Because a giraffe is a fucking miracle.
Stupidest Political Trend: The Left claiming that their rhetoric is just as hateful and violent as the Right’s.
Seriously. Quit it.
Funniest Political Story: Aqua Buddha
Remember, it’s funnier to the tune of Kool & The Gang’s “Jungle Boogie.”
Southern Hospitality Award: The City of Mayfield
For their acceptance of the Somali Muslims.
Gadsden Flag Award: Rand Paul
For protecting small business owners from the kind of government tyranny that would require them to serve black people.
Biggest Disappointment: The Mid-term Elections/The Obama Presidency (tie)
These are really two sides of the same coin, both proving that most Americans are stupid enough to believe that there’s a difference between the political parties. The truth is we’ve got one party: The Corporate Interest Party, which politically is somewhere to the right of nearly every single one of the first 39 Presidents. We need some variety. Next time around, lets elect some old school Democrats, old school Republicans, true Progressives, principled Libertarians, Environmental Nutjobs, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and METHODISTS!
Movies
Best Movie: True Grit
Best Use Of Gratuitous Violence In A Motion Picture: Machete
Triumph of the Year: The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus
Those of us who have experienced the heartbreak of watching Lost In La Mancha were sure that Heath Ledger’s death would make this another Gilliam movie that never saw the light of day.
Tragedy of the Year: News that The Man Who Killed Don Quixote was once again on hold.
Seriously, why the hell won’t somebody just give Gilliam a big pile of money? Also, the film rights to Good Omens.
Worst Movie News: That they’re making a Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie without Joss Whedon.
Hudson Hawk Award: Scott Pilgrim Vs. The Universe
The Hudson Hawk Award goes to the most awesome move of the year that most people just didn’t get.
What You See Is What You Get Award: Hot Tub Time Machine
Most Wasted Potential: The Expendables
Worst Casting Decision: Giving Ali Shawkat a role with almost no lines. (Runaways, which also totally dissed Lita Ford).
Most Gratuitously Ironic Ending In An Otherwise Very Good Movie: A Single Man
Worst Movie of the Year: Faster
Most Overdue Award: Jeff Bridges’ Oscar for Crazy Heart.
Music
Album of the Year: AgriDustrial, The Legendary Shack Shakers
Song of the Year: “Hoboes Are My Heroes” by The Legendary Shack Shakers
While the song is, in fact, great, the real reason the Shack Shakers get this award is for their early recognition of the fact that 2011 will be the Year of the Hobo. Hobos are going to be the new zombies, folks. Get ready for it.
Local Band of the Year: Uncle Skunkle & The Scarecrow Family Band
Long-time title-holders The Union Suit were edged out this year by Skunkle, in part because these guys played so damn many shows--hall shows, house parties, bar mitzvahs--Hell, if you didn’t lock your door there was a good chance you’d come home to find them setting up instruments in your living room. Also, I’m pretty sure they stole some of Trent Summar’s Hank Flamingo-era outfits, which has to count for something.
Miscellaneous
Celebrity Who Turned Out To Be Just Who We Always Hoped He Was: Bill Murray
As revealed in Dan Fierman’s GQ interview. The Daniel Clowes art was also a nice touch.
Most Talked About Geek Television Event: AMC’s The Walking Dead
Fucking Kirkman.
Meme of the Year: The “Bed Intruder Song” by Antoine Dodson & Autotune The News
T-Shirt of the Year: Topless Robot’s shirt featuring Dr. Doom riding a Unicorn
Role-Playing Game of the Year: American Artifacts (Hex Games)
There were a lot of worthy nominees in this category: Sex, Lies, & Ultraspies (Hex Games), Mars & Venus At War (Hex Games), Fratboys Vs. (Hex Games), and many others(mostly not Hex Games), but American Artifacts wins the prize.
Winner of ComicCon: Helen Miran, for her Harvey Pekar shirt.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
File Sharing = Terrorism?
This article originally appeared in the December/January issue of Bazooka Magazine.
The next time you decide to visit your favorite torrent website, there’s a chance you’ll see a big shiny Department of Homeland Security logo and message about how much prison time you can get for copyright infringement. In the last week of November, the DHS shut down and seized the domain names of at least 76 web sites for copyright violations. Most of the websites that were shut down were torrent file sharing sites, but at least one, torrent-finder.com, was a torrent search engine similar to Google. Operating under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (which we can thank Clinton for), DHS was able to shut down these sites without a court order and without any requirement that the copyright holders prove that infringement was taking place. This is fucked up in so many different ways I don’t even know where to begin.
I guess the best place to start is the flawed premise that file sharing is the reason for entertainment companies’ falling bottom lines. I don’t have any research to back this up, but I’d be willing to bet that only about 5% of the files your average software pirate “steals” is something that they’d pay for if they couldn’t download it. If I really want to see a movie, I’ll pay to see it on the big screen; if a musician I like comes out with a new album, I want to read the liner notes and make sure he gets paid so he can make more great music; if I want to read a book, I want to read--well--a book, which I’ll never believe can be replaced by a computer file, no matter how many times Apple and Amazon try to tell me otherwise. Except for live or obscure stuff that isn’t available for sale, most things I get through file-sharing and similar sites are things I’d simply live without if I had to pay for. If I’ve got any confidence in something, I’ll pay for it, if only to avoid the trouble that comes with trying to download something illegally or pseudo-legally: the viruses, the mislabeled and damaged files, and the overly anal rules of most “invite-only” sites.
The real reason music companies are losing money is the simple fact that most albums are one great song, two decent songs, and the rest filler or shit. For example, I’ve paid for two Kid Rock CDs in my life. If you assume that a good album should have 8 listenable songs, that motherfucker still owes me about 10 songs. As for movies, most either follow bland formulas or cynically attempt to cash in on the success of the latest release that had something new or interesting to offer. Basically, the problem is that most of today’s entertainment is being created as a product, not a work of art. I’d wager that guys like Tom Waits and Robert Rodriguez who treat their work as a creative endeavor haven’t seen as much revenue loss as the Nickelbacks and Michael Bays of the world.
The commodification of creativity is at the root of another problem related to this whole mess: our nation’s copyright laws. While intellectual property laws have always aimed (rightly) to protect the commercial rights of the artist, they used to be tempered with the concept of fair use, which is based on the idea that art cannot exist in a vacuum and that enduring art belongs to the creative commons, essentially becoming “words” in the vocabulary of our “cultural language.” In the 20th Century, thanks in part to corporate ownership of creative works coupled with the insipid idea that corporations are people, the concepts of fair use and a creative commons have been gutted. We can thank the Disney Corporation for a lot of this. Whenever Uncle Walt’s creations are about to enter the commons due to copyright expiration, Disney uses its influence (and campaign contribution fund) to make sure the laws are changed in their favor. This has happened so many times that copyright laws are sometimes known as “Mickey Mouse Laws.”
The big problem with the death of fair use and the creative commons is that restricts the ability of subsequent artists to use cultural touchstones in their work. Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck are as much a part of our nation’s symbolic landscape as Daniel Boone and Abe Lincoln, but if you try to use the talking animals to comment on the American experience, there’s an excellent chance that you’ll hear from Team Rodent’s legal department. Even satire and parody, which used to fall firmly into the fair use category, are getting trickier to do without possible legal ramifications. If you don’t believe me, Google “Keiron Dwyer” +Starbucks. If you fail to see the cultural importance of satire and parody, I recommend watching The People Versus Larry Flynt. There’s a scene in there where Ed Norton explains it better than I ever could.
Even if the entertainment industry wasn’t morally bankrupt and our copyright laws protected the creator without stifling commentary, these shutdowns are still problematic in their potential for abuse. The sites were shut down with no court order, no chance for the site owner to prove innocence, and apparently no requirement for the DHS to even make a token effort to confirm infringement. With some of the sites, it’s debatable whether copyright violations have actually taken place. As far as I can tell, all that’s required to shut down a web site is for the DHS to say that someone has claimed the site violates their copyright. There’s no need to prove that a violation has occurred, or even that a complainant exists. The lack of any form of due process essentially gives the DHS a simple way to bypass the First Amendment and possibly other basic rights.
Last but not least, does anyone else find it a little odd that this particular branch of copyright enforcement falls to the Department of Homeland Security? Is there some secret Al-Queda plan to take over the country with bootleg copies of Jay Z albums? Wouldn’t it make more sense for the Interstate Commerce Commission or the FCC or any of a dozen other agencies to be handling these duties? I can think of two possible reasons why the DHS is handling this. The first is that with the “War on Terror” going on, Homeland Security is the department whose actions most people are least likely to question, so they’re a good choice for ethically questionable operations like this one. The other possibility is that those in power are finally admitting, albeit subtly, that they consider protecting corporate profits, not protecting average citizens, to be the real role of government. Both of those possibilities kinda suck.
The next time you decide to visit your favorite torrent website, there’s a chance you’ll see a big shiny Department of Homeland Security logo and message about how much prison time you can get for copyright infringement. In the last week of November, the DHS shut down and seized the domain names of at least 76 web sites for copyright violations. Most of the websites that were shut down were torrent file sharing sites, but at least one, torrent-finder.com, was a torrent search engine similar to Google. Operating under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (which we can thank Clinton for), DHS was able to shut down these sites without a court order and without any requirement that the copyright holders prove that infringement was taking place. This is fucked up in so many different ways I don’t even know where to begin.
I guess the best place to start is the flawed premise that file sharing is the reason for entertainment companies’ falling bottom lines. I don’t have any research to back this up, but I’d be willing to bet that only about 5% of the files your average software pirate “steals” is something that they’d pay for if they couldn’t download it. If I really want to see a movie, I’ll pay to see it on the big screen; if a musician I like comes out with a new album, I want to read the liner notes and make sure he gets paid so he can make more great music; if I want to read a book, I want to read--well--a book, which I’ll never believe can be replaced by a computer file, no matter how many times Apple and Amazon try to tell me otherwise. Except for live or obscure stuff that isn’t available for sale, most things I get through file-sharing and similar sites are things I’d simply live without if I had to pay for. If I’ve got any confidence in something, I’ll pay for it, if only to avoid the trouble that comes with trying to download something illegally or pseudo-legally: the viruses, the mislabeled and damaged files, and the overly anal rules of most “invite-only” sites.
The real reason music companies are losing money is the simple fact that most albums are one great song, two decent songs, and the rest filler or shit. For example, I’ve paid for two Kid Rock CDs in my life. If you assume that a good album should have 8 listenable songs, that motherfucker still owes me about 10 songs. As for movies, most either follow bland formulas or cynically attempt to cash in on the success of the latest release that had something new or interesting to offer. Basically, the problem is that most of today’s entertainment is being created as a product, not a work of art. I’d wager that guys like Tom Waits and Robert Rodriguez who treat their work as a creative endeavor haven’t seen as much revenue loss as the Nickelbacks and Michael Bays of the world.
The commodification of creativity is at the root of another problem related to this whole mess: our nation’s copyright laws. While intellectual property laws have always aimed (rightly) to protect the commercial rights of the artist, they used to be tempered with the concept of fair use, which is based on the idea that art cannot exist in a vacuum and that enduring art belongs to the creative commons, essentially becoming “words” in the vocabulary of our “cultural language.” In the 20th Century, thanks in part to corporate ownership of creative works coupled with the insipid idea that corporations are people, the concepts of fair use and a creative commons have been gutted. We can thank the Disney Corporation for a lot of this. Whenever Uncle Walt’s creations are about to enter the commons due to copyright expiration, Disney uses its influence (and campaign contribution fund) to make sure the laws are changed in their favor. This has happened so many times that copyright laws are sometimes known as “Mickey Mouse Laws.”
The big problem with the death of fair use and the creative commons is that restricts the ability of subsequent artists to use cultural touchstones in their work. Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck are as much a part of our nation’s symbolic landscape as Daniel Boone and Abe Lincoln, but if you try to use the talking animals to comment on the American experience, there’s an excellent chance that you’ll hear from Team Rodent’s legal department. Even satire and parody, which used to fall firmly into the fair use category, are getting trickier to do without possible legal ramifications. If you don’t believe me, Google “Keiron Dwyer” +Starbucks. If you fail to see the cultural importance of satire and parody, I recommend watching The People Versus Larry Flynt. There’s a scene in there where Ed Norton explains it better than I ever could.
Even if the entertainment industry wasn’t morally bankrupt and our copyright laws protected the creator without stifling commentary, these shutdowns are still problematic in their potential for abuse. The sites were shut down with no court order, no chance for the site owner to prove innocence, and apparently no requirement for the DHS to even make a token effort to confirm infringement. With some of the sites, it’s debatable whether copyright violations have actually taken place. As far as I can tell, all that’s required to shut down a web site is for the DHS to say that someone has claimed the site violates their copyright. There’s no need to prove that a violation has occurred, or even that a complainant exists. The lack of any form of due process essentially gives the DHS a simple way to bypass the First Amendment and possibly other basic rights.
Last but not least, does anyone else find it a little odd that this particular branch of copyright enforcement falls to the Department of Homeland Security? Is there some secret Al-Queda plan to take over the country with bootleg copies of Jay Z albums? Wouldn’t it make more sense for the Interstate Commerce Commission or the FCC or any of a dozen other agencies to be handling these duties? I can think of two possible reasons why the DHS is handling this. The first is that with the “War on Terror” going on, Homeland Security is the department whose actions most people are least likely to question, so they’re a good choice for ethically questionable operations like this one. The other possibility is that those in power are finally admitting, albeit subtly, that they consider protecting corporate profits, not protecting average citizens, to be the real role of government. Both of those possibilities kinda suck.
Friday, January 7, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
